In person

The subject will be evaluated during the semester through continuous evaluation through 1) Autonomous work a) virtual: Questionnaires, exercises and critical reading; b) non-virtual: clinical cases carried out and participation in class and 2) Written tests distributed throughout the course.

Relationship of the evaluation approach with the competences and the learning results
The evaluation method will include all educational methodologies since, on the one hand, individual work and synthesis in individual tests will be collected, but also continuous and team work, as well as the synthesis of information with class discussions, reading literature and exercises.

The evaluation of the subject is carried out through continuous evaluation. In the continuous evaluation, the moodle autonomous work questionnaires will be worth 8%, the work for participation in class will be worth 12% (questionnaires after work in class 70%, case of a patient 30%), and 40% each of the 2 intermediate written tests.
With regard to the realization of the "case of a patient" point out that your note will be given on the one hand by the teacher's assessment regarding the answers to the questions raised in the "patient case" (80%) and on the other hand the assessment that the teammates have made regarding how their participation has been in the realization of the answers to the "patient's case" (10%), and finally the assessment that the teacher will make on the answers that each student will write at the end of the case in relation to the development of their own leadership during the execution of the case work, emphasizing the dimensions of teamwork and impact/influence (10%).

In short, the percentages will be:
o 8% moodle quizzes outside of class
o 8.4% work done in class
o 2.88% answers to the questions of a patient's case
o 0.36% assessment of your colleagues regarding your participation in the case
o 0.36% teacher assessment on Teamwork and Impact/ Influence of the case
o 40% first written test (the subject that is included in this test is no longer included in the second written test, whether it is approved or not, that is, the mark is maintained for the calculation of the general mark of the subject)
o 40% second written test (enters the rest of the material that did not enter the first written test)

In any case, the general mark of the subject will be the application of these percentages.

Regarding the second call to note:

In the second call the percentages will be:
• 4% self-employment questionnaires moodle,
• 16% the work for participation in class (questionnaires after work in class 70%, case of a patient 30%),
• and 40% each of the 2 intermediate written tests.

In the second call, the notes of each section will be as follows:
• of the moodle quizzes can be recovered by doing them again, but obtaining a grade of 5 at most.
• The mark of the works for participation in class (questionnaires after class work and case of a patient) cannot be recovered and the marks will be the same as during the first call, in this way said participation in the first call is emphasized.
• With regard to the mark of the intermediate written tests, indicate that if a student has passed one of the two written tests, said mark will be maintained and only the part of the written test that they did not pass should be examined in the second call final exam. First call. If the first and second written tests of the first call were failed, then the second call exam would include the syllabus for the entire subject.

In short, the percentages will be:
o 4% moodle quizzes outside of class. Recoverable maximum 5
o 11.2% work done in class. Unrecoverable
o 3.84% answers to the questions of the case of a non-recoverable patient
o 0.48% assessment of your peers regarding your participation in the Non-recoverable case
o 0.48% teacher assessment on Teamwork and Impact/ Influence of the case Non-recoverable
o 40% first written test. If it was approved, the note of the 1st call is maintained, if it was suspended it will be the note of the 2nd call.
o 40% second written test. If it was approved, the note of the 1st call is maintained, if it was suspended it will be the note of the 2nd call.

In any case, the general mark of the subject will be the application of these percentages, although Honors will not be awarded in the 2nd call.

Third and Fourth evaluation (and extraordinary)

 The subject will be evaluated with the same system as in the first and second call and in no case will a grade from one course to another be kept.

 Rules governing the course

• Presence and participation

Although class attendance is not mandatory, it is important to highlight that those days where class work is done, especially the exercises, will be a great help, so that not attending them will make it difficult for the student to pass the subject.

• Integrity in student work

During the completion of work, students commit to be creative and avoid plagiarism.

• Reference to key elements of the institutional calendar

It is important to comply with the calendar attached to be able to keep up with the classes (calendar is attached in the teaching guide).

Procedure for plagiarism or academic fraud

Any assignment or activity (including exams) in which plagiarism, falsification or academic fraud is detected, will result in a failure of the activity and an academic sanction that will entail from the loss of enrolment rights in this subject, to the opening of a file process.